VID display for Nehalem processors & Suggestions
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:25 pm
This was in CoreTemp before when it was updated for Nehalem support but why was it removed? Any blabber on the net about Nehalem "not having VIDs" is garbage just as much as "running 1.45v QPI/VTT is perfectly safe". Gigabyte boards show the stock VID for each multiplier thats in use in BIOS, and it is accurate, why can't CoreTemp? If it does come back would it be able to scale properly with dynamic VID setting? EX my i7 920 running the x21 multiplier has a VID of 1.28125v, I have my DVID set as +0.09375v to give me 1.37500v which is the needed value to be stable at it's overclock. So when x21 multiplier is in use (load) CoreTemp should say 1.37500v, this possible?
For another feature request, would it be possible to add a "Thermal Monitor/TM" or "PROCHOT#" readout for each core? Saying either "OK", when well temps are ok, or "HOT" when PROCHOT# is active or has been active if a processor's core(s) are to reach Tjunction max.
"Select CPU" on top should be renamed to "Select Processor" instead for better wording.
In the "Tj Max" column (since its got so much empty space) maybe constantly displaying the delta to Tj Max using the hottest core, or all seperated by comma (xx,xx,xx,xx). Or using an average calculated from the cores' temps such as 73c, 75c, 72c, 73c = 73c
For another feature request, would it be possible to add a "Thermal Monitor/TM" or "PROCHOT#" readout for each core? Saying either "OK", when well temps are ok, or "HOT" when PROCHOT# is active or has been active if a processor's core(s) are to reach Tjunction max.
"Select CPU" on top should be renamed to "Select Processor" instead for better wording.
In the "Tj Max" column (since its got so much empty space) maybe constantly displaying the delta to Tj Max using the hottest core, or all seperated by comma (xx,xx,xx,xx). Or using an average calculated from the cores' temps such as 73c, 75c, 72c, 73c = 73c