Page 1 of 1

CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:25 pm
by Patricki7
Hello,

AMD A6 9210.png
AMD A6 9210.png (123.02 KiB) Viewed 1024 times


It looks like the AMD A6-9210 R4 is not supported.

CoreTemp: 1.10.2
OS: Windows 10.0.14393 build 14393
64-bit

CoreTemp-Dump.txt
(73.41 KiB) Downloaded 30 times

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:03 pm
by The Coolest
I sent you a PM, please check it out.

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:22 pm
by Patricki7
It looks like the debug build did not resolve the issue. Tried both x86 and x64.

DebugHelper.txt
(179 Bytes) Downloaded 31 times

CoreTemp-Dump64.txt
(73.41 KiB) Downloaded 31 times

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:41 pm
by The Coolest
Thanks.
I've uploaded a newer build, same URL. Could you try it out?

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:28 pm
by Patricki7
It is working smoothly. Including Tray temperatures. Extremely quick turn-around time! Both x64 and x86.

CoreTemp-Scr.png
CoreTemp-Scr.png (15.19 KiB) Viewed 1011 times

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:09 pm
by The Coolest
Ummm, that's an Intel machine...

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 11:51 am
by Naki
The Coolest wrote:Ummm, that's an Intel machine...

Nice one indeed! Maybe a dual socket mobo with 2 CPUs - both AMD & Intel? :D (just joking here..)

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:40 pm
by Patricki7
Oops. I was testing it on two very similar machines. An HP 450 G4 and an HP 455 G4. They look exactly the same, must have mixed them up. However it is indeed working on the AMD A6-9210

CoreTemp-Scr.png
CoreTemp-Scr.png (13.74 KiB) Viewed 947 times


DebugHelper.txt
(3.91 KiB) Downloaded 31 times

Re: CoreTemp 1.10.2 Unsupported AMD A6-9210

PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 4:14 pm
by The Coolest
Oh, that's understandable :)
Thanks for testing!