CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, RC6)

Post about bugs you find in Core Temp so they can be addressed and fixed efficiently
Post Reply
The_Assimilator
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:28 am
Location: South Africa

CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, RC6)

Post by The_Assimilator »

CPU: Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge) @ 4.5GHz/1.392V
Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme6

My CPU is overclocked but EIST is enabled in the BIOS to allow it to throttle down to its minimum clocks/voltages (1.6GHz/1.024V) when idle. CPU-Z and various other hardware identification applications correctly track the CPU's throttling up and down, but Core Temp does not - it's always stuck displaying the maximum reading, 4.5GHz/1.392V. Obviously this negates much of the usefulness of Core Temp.

I first noticed this issue in Core Temp 1.0 RC5 and had hoped it would be fixed by RC6 but unfortunately not.

If you require any additional information please advise, I will happily provide it if possible. Also willing to test debug builds if that helps to isolate the issue.

User avatar
The Coolest
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:48 pm
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, R

Post by The Coolest »

Try to open the System Info screen under tools and see what happens to the frequency/vid values there.
Also what Windows are you running on your system?
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
NAS:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB + HDDs / GPU: ATi Mach64 VT2 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Secondary rigs:
Core i3 7130U / MiniPC / SanDisk SDSSDP-128G / GPU: Intel HD 620 / Mem: 1x8GB DDR3L-1600
Xeon X3430 2.40GHz @ 3.06GHz or Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / PNY CS1111 240GB / GPU: ATI FirePro V3800 / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W
AMD Phenom II X4 B93 / Mobo: ASUS M2A-VM / GPU: ATI Radeon Xpress X1250 / Crucial M4 120GB / Mem: 2x2GB DDR2-800 - 4GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.

Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

The_Assimilator
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:28 am
Location: South Africa

Re: CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, R

Post by The_Assimilator »

Since I made this post I swapped out my CPU for an i5-3570K running at 4.7GHz, problem still persists. My OS is Windows 7 Professional x64.

I opened the System Information window like you suggested. All 4 cores were pegged at 4.7GHz, but the VID was fluctuating between 1.1809 and 1.1859 volts. Then I closed System Information (without pressing the refresh button) and suddenly Core Temp started reading the frequencies/VID correctly!

Let me try a few more tests, will post again later.

User avatar
The Coolest
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:48 pm
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, R

Post by The Coolest »

What is the power plan select in Power Options? Try setting it to Balanced (or to power saver if it is already on balanced) and see if this affects Core Temp's readings.
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
NAS:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB + HDDs / GPU: ATi Mach64 VT2 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Secondary rigs:
Core i3 7130U / MiniPC / SanDisk SDSSDP-128G / GPU: Intel HD 620 / Mem: 1x8GB DDR3L-1600
Xeon X3430 2.40GHz @ 3.06GHz or Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / PNY CS1111 240GB / GPU: ATI FirePro V3800 / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W
AMD Phenom II X4 B93 / Mobo: ASUS M2A-VM / GPU: ATI Radeon Xpress X1250 / Crucial M4 120GB / Mem: 2x2GB DDR2-800 - 4GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.

Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

The_Assimilator
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:28 am
Location: South Africa

Re: CPU frequency/voltage always read at maximum (1.0 RC5, R

Post by The_Assimilator »

The Coolest wrote:What is the power plan select in Power Options? Try setting it to Balanced (or to power saver if it is already on balanced) and see if this affects Core Temp's readings.
It's set to Balanced, been set on that since I installed the OS. Things are still weird, here's what I did:

1. Shut down the PC.
2. Booted up again, I have Core Temp set to load with Windows, so it launched. At that stage it was correctly displaying the idle/turbo frequencies/voltages as the machine switched between them.
3. Put the computer into Sleep mode. When I woke it, Core Temp was stuck on the turbo freq/volts. Opening System Information and clicking "Refresh" did not change anything.
4. Restarted Core Temp, it was still stuck on the turbo freq/volts. Opened System Information and watched it, after about a minute the freq/volts started updating correctly without me touching anything, after that Core Temp works as expected.

So I have a workaround now: restart Core Temp after waking the computer from Sleep - which isn't ideal, but I won't lose any sleep over it. :)

The super weird part is that when I made this post, Core Temp was always reading the freq/volts at turbo levels - regardless of what I did (although I have to say I never opened the System Information window before today). I also haven't updated BIOS/drivers - literally the only thing that's changed is that I swapped out the CPU - perhaps a Windows update changed something?

Last thing to note - in the BIOS settings for my board, I have disabled C-state related options as they can interfere with an overclock - however EIST is still enabled. Could this be confusing Core Temp?

Post Reply

Return to “Bug reports”