pictures in signatures..... a big "no no"

by **Filip04** » Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:41 pm

i personally don't think we should have pictures in our signatures, as it makes the whole forum one big MESS, AND causes it to load longer....

anyone agree??? (well, you better, cuz i'm right)

by **The Coolest** » Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:46 pm

hmmmm... Well none of the pics here are running off the servers, so unless u r B/W limited it should not affect the speed of the forums themselves.I like the idea of pics in sigs. Unless they're too big.

I think anything under 400x100 should be OK. Exactly the size that Andy has. LOL

by **Gnerma** » Thu Feb 27, 2003 3:07 am

Filip04 wrote:i personally don't think we should have pictures in our signatures, as it makes the whole forum one big MESS, AND causes it to load longer....

anyone agree??? (well, you better, cuz i'm right)

I agree, I hate pictures in sigs as well. Why? Because people make the biggest, bloated pics and put them in their sigs, it looks like crap.

by **The Coolest** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:11 am

The_Coolest wrote:hmmmm... Well none of the pics here are running off the servers, so unless u r B/W limited it should not affect the speed of the forums themselves.I like the idea of pics in sigs. Unless they're too big.

I think anything under 400x100 should be OK.

pictures in signatures..... a big "no no"

pictures in signatures..... a big "no no"

Re: pictures in signatures..... a big "no no"

Who is online


	Board index ‹ Archive ‹ Archive ‹ General Forum ‹ Forum Comments And Suggestions Print view


	Author Message pictures in signatures..... a big "no no" by Filip04 » Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:41 pm i personally don't think we should have pictures in our signatures, as it makes the whole forum one big MESS, AND causes it to load longer.... anyone agree??? (well, you better, cuz i'm right) Filip04 Registered User Posts: 29 Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:17 pm Top by The Coolest » Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:46 pm hmmmm... Well none of the pics here are running off the servers, so unless u r B/W limited it should not affect the speed of the forums themselves.I like the idea of pics in sigs. Unless they're too big. I think anything under 400x100 should be OK. Exactly the size that Andy has. LOL Member of our O/C Folding @ Home team "<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now! Main rig: Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.5GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / SSD: Crucial M4 128GB (+ HDDs) / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBXL RipJaws X - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W. Secondary rig: Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ Stock / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 2x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 4GB total / PSU: FSP ATX350-PNR 350W. Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors The Coolest Site Admin Posts: 2239 Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:48 pm Location: Tel Aviv, Israel Website ICQ YIM Top Re: pictures in signatures..... a big "no no" by Gnerma » Thu Feb 27, 2003 3:07 am Filip04 wrote:i personally don't think we should have pictures in our signatures, as it makes the whole forum one big MESS, AND causes it to load longer.... anyone agree??? (well, you better, cuz i'm right) I agree, I hate pictures in sigs as well. Why? Because people make the biggest, bloated pics and put them in their sigs, it looks like crap. /me pwns j00 a\|\| Gnerma Registered User Posts: 13 Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 11:42 am Top by The Coolest » Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:11 am The_Coolest wrote:hmmmm... Well none of the pics here are running off the servers, so unless u r B/W limited it should not affect the speed of the forums themselves.I like the idea of pics in sigs. Unless they're too big. I think anything under 400x100 should be OK. Member of our O/C Folding @ Home team "<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now! Main rig: Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.5GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / SSD: Crucial M4 128GB (+ HDDs) / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBXL RipJaws X - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W. Secondary rig: Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ Stock / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 2x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 4GB total / PSU: FSP ATX350-PNR 350W. Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors The Coolest Site Admin Posts: 2239 Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:48 pm Location: Tel Aviv, Israel Website ICQ YIM Top


	Who is online Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest